Legal Opinion

Specht v. Patterson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1967No. 831PublishedCited by 815 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

We held in Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241, that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not require a judge to have hearings and to give a convicted person an opportunity to participate in those hearings when he came to determine the sentence to be imposédT We said:

“Under the practice of individualizing punishments, investigational techniques have been given an important role. Probation workers making reports of their investigations have not been trained to prosecute but to aid offenders. Their reports have been given a high value by conscientious judges who want to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by815 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

810 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API