State v. Santos
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
Maternity has been said to be a matter of fact and paternity a matter of opinion. Although science cannot with certainty determine a child's father, it has made great strides to help ensure that the wrong man will not be held responsible.1 Despite the numerous burdens and benefits of being a father, however, it is the child who has the most at stake in a paternity proceeding. In this matter, Miguel Santos appeals from denial of a motion to vacate a stipulated judgment and order of paternity entered against him on November 16, 1982. Although we find that the trial court properly denied Santos'…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Luckett v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Haueter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of MarkowskiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.