Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Turner, Commissioner
Affirming.
This is the second appeal. The opinion on the first appeal will he found in 211 Ky. 830, and the same is referred to for a statement of the essential facts.
Un the first trial there was a verdict for the plaintiff of $25,000.00 in damages, and on that appeal the judgment was reversed primarily because of excessive damages, it being held therein that the evidence of the permanency .of the plaintiff’s injuries was not of that positive and satisfactory nature necessary to sustain so large a verdict. The opinion on that appeal likewise discussed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Bondurant's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Fitzmaurice v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Payne v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- J. N. Youngblood Truck Lines v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- Borum v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.