Legal Opinion
Borum v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1931No. 28,283PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The plaintiff sustained an injury while working for the defendant in interstate commerce. He brought an action for damages. Issue was joined. The parties then entered into an agreement for arbitration of all the issues comprehended in the pleadings. The arbitrators awarded the plaintiff $12,500. It was a statutory arbitration. The court confirmed the award. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
On December 11, 1928, the plaintiff, Borran, sustained the loss of both legs below the knees while employed as a switchman in the yards of the defendant at Minneapolis. His…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- First National Bank v. StraitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Goddard v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. BorumSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dawson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1934
- Mueller v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Blanton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Utah Galena Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.