Fitzmaurice v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
The plaintiff, while riding upon a train of the defendant, was injured by reason of a collision; and no question is made but that she would have been entitled to a verdict in her favor if she had the rights of a passenger. She was a minor. She was riding upon a three months’ season ticket which was good only for students under eighteen years of age. She had obtained this ticket by presenting to the defendant’s ticket agent a certificate purporting to be signed by *160her father that she was under eighteen years of age and was a pupil in the Hollander Art School, Boston, and agreeing that she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Banks v. BramanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BeggsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. MuhlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. BrooksIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Bjornquist v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Warren v. PazoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Lupher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.