State v. Trong Kim Huynh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
In this case we consider what constitutes an “enterprise” under Minn.Stat. § 609.903, subd. .1(1) (1992), known as Minnesota’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). We affirm defendant’s conviction for racketeering, and we also affirm the trial court’s ranking the offense of racketeering at severity level VIII for sentencing purposes.
The victim in this case, Hung Huynh (no relation to the defendant), came to the United States from Vietnam in 1979. He and his wife opened a restaurant in Golden Valley. In August 1990, defendant-appellant Trong Kim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Winchester v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Winchester v. SteinWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.