Legal Opinion

Von Meding v. Strahl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1948No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 43,426PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiffs-appellants von Meding seek to qniet title to lands in Berrien county in themselves and to restrain many neighboring property-owners, including appellees, from using such lands. The lands can be more readily identified by reference to the map hereto attached. For purposes of this opinion it is unnecessary to give the long legal descriptions of the respective parcels. The property .to which plaintiffs claim .exclusive title free from all easements claimed by appellees consists of the property marked “C” together with a 20-foot wide lane beginning at the southeasterly part of “C” and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. St. Cecelia Society v. Universal Car & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Burling v. LeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Morgan v. MeuthMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Zemon v. NetzorgMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Stewart v. HuntMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Wolf Creek Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Rutland v. StewartMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Matthews v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. SPECIAL PROPERTY VI LLC v. WoodruffMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API