Legal Opinion

Hayward v. MORRISON ET UX.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of an oral contract for the sale and purchase of land, brought by E. H. Hayward, as plaintiff, against N. I. Morrison and Jane Morrison, Ms wife, as defendants. Decree was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

The defendants were the owners as tenants by the entirety of the east half of lots 35 and 36, in the city of Scio, Linn county, Oregon. At some time after this appeal ivas perfected, defendant N. I. Morrison died, and defendant Jane Morrison, as the surviving spouse, and pursuant to law, became vested with legal title to the whole…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Walter v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. West v. Washington Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stettler v. StettlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hampton v. StruveNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Brown v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Smith v. Portland Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API