Legal Opinion

Young v. NEILL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1950PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, J.

This is an appeal from a decree denying specific performance of an alleged lease of a grocery store in Ashland, Oregon, the terms and conditions thereof being embraced in a written, unsigned instrument. Plaintiff-appellant Young and her ex-husband Neill, re*164spondent-cross appellant, were the lessees, and the defendants-respondents McGee, husband and wife, were the lessors. Mr. Neill and Mrs. McGee are brother and sister; Mr. McGee is a minister of the gospel. Since Mrs. Young and Mr. Neill were married at the time of the transactions involved herein, we will hereinafter designate them as “the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bevan v. TemplemanOregon Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Badger v. Paulson Investment Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Higby v. HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API