Legal Opinion

Eveready Freight Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1969No. 23347PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The plaintiff in error, Eveready Freight Service, Inc., was the plaintiff in the district court and will be referred to as Eveready. Defendant in error Public Utilities Commission will be referred to as the Commission, and defendant in error Denver-Climax Truck Line, Inc., will be referred to as Denver-Climax.

This writ of error is to a district court judgment affirming the Commission’s refusal to grant Eveready permission to haul sodium silicate for American Metals Climax from their mine at Climax, Colorado, to the company’s operation at the Urad Mine site near Empire, Colorado.

Eveready is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Public Utilities Commission v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Parrish v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. McBride v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Southeast Colorado Power Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North Eastern Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Answerphone, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Bethke v. Edson Express, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
  4. East West Resort Transportation, LLC v. BinzDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  5. J.C. Trucking, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API