McBride v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.
There are two questions raised in this case:
1. Is the phrase, “regularly scheduled passenger flight of a commercial aircraft,” as used in the policy of life insurance, aAibiguous ?
2. Does the incontestability provision in a policy of life insurance act as a limitation or invalidation of an aviation ' rider, where such incontestability provision does not include the aviation rider as an exception to such provision?
The policy here in question contains a rider, attached thereto, designated “War and Aviation Clause.” Among other things, the rider provides that the liability of the insurer is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Bernier v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Shear v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Messina v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
- Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
- Bennett v. HeidingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.