Legal Opinion

McBride v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1947No. 30743PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.

There are two questions raised in this case:

1. Is the phrase, “regularly scheduled passenger flight of a commercial aircraft,” as used in the policy of life insurance, aAibiguous ?

2. Does the incontestability provision in a policy of life insurance act as a limitation or invalidation of an aviation ' rider, where such incontestability provision does not include the aviation rider as an exception to such provision?

The policy here in question contains a rider, attached thereto, designated “War and Aviation Clause.” Among other things, the rider provides that the liability of the insurer is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Bernier v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Jolley v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. FishbackWashington Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Shear v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Messina v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964
  4. Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
  5. Bennett v. HeidingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API