Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 4, 1956No. 17899PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

The individual plaintiffs in error are property owners living within a defined area in Adams county, adjacent to the City and County of Denver; are users of Denver city water for domestic purposes; and pay Denver directly for the water used by them. Denver’s water mains terminate at the city limits. By virtue of a so-called “distributor’s contract” made and entered into on October 24,. 1952, between the City and County of Denver, acting by its Board of Water Commissioners, and W. F. Cobb, doing business as Cobb Plumbing and Utility Company, one of the defendants in error, the city water was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Englewood v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Tri-County Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. City of Northglenn v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API