Legal Opinion

Answerphone, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 3, 1974No. 25951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

The key issue on appeal is whether a certificate of public convenience and necessity was issued erroneously to RAM Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc. (RAM). The granting of the certificate by the Public Utilities Commission was reviewed by the district court. The district court upheld the commis sion, and an appeal has been prosecuted to this court. We affirm.

RAM obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity to provide integrated mobile radio-telephone and paging service throughout the metropolitan Denver area. Answerphone, Inc., Mobile Radio-Telephone Service, Inc., and Colorado…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Aspen Airways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. North Eastern Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Public Utilities Commission v. Home Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Colorado-Ute Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. RAM Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Mellow Yellow Taxi Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Contact-Colorado Springs, Inc. v. Mobile Radio Telephone Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. Colorado Energy Advocacy Office v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API