East West Resort Transportation, LLC v. Binz
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff East West Resort Transportation (“CME”) and defendants Ron Binz, Polly Page and Carl Miller, Commissioners of the Public Utility Commission of Colorado, (defendants will be referred to herein as “the Commission”) filed cross-motions for summary judgment on CME’s claims that the Commission’s efforts to regulate its rates are preempted by federal law and violate the Commerce Clause, Article I, § 8 of the United States Constitution. For the reasons stated below, CME’s motion is GRANTED and the Commission’s motion is DENIED.
I.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Medina v. CramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of New Hampshire v. Wayne A. Bickford & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015