Legal Opinion

Lee-Strauss Co. v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1928No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff corporation furnished the defendant with certain personal property to be used in her store under a contract of conditional sale. It was agreed that the purchase price should be paid by installments of fixed amounts. Title was reserved in the vendor, but it was agreed that, when the full sum stipulated for had been satisfied, a bill of sale would be given the vendee. The designated articles were delivered, and the payments made until August 29, 1926, when the purchaser became in default. In December following, a writ of replevin was issued to recover…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. John Deere Plow Co. v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Duroth Manufacturing Co. v. CauffielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Hall's Safe Co. v. WalenkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. General Motors Truck Co. v. Philadelphia Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CaiazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Goss Printing Press Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Koehring Company v. VentrescaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Bentz v. BarclaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API