Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Leverington Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1938No. Appeal, 156PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Kephabt,

Appellee, upon completion of some construction work in March, 1930, left his gasoline shovel upon a vacant lot, where it remained, unprotected from climatic conditions and from theft of removable parts. In March, 1936, appellant “purchased” the shovel for $225 from the mortgagee in control of the lot, and expended approximately $2,800 in repairing the machine to malee it available for immediate work. Appellee brought this action of replevin to secure the possession of the shovel.

During the time the shovel remained on the lot, the mortgagee-vendor tried…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. New York & Penna. Co. v. N. Y. Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Mitchell v. Standard Repair Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Herdic v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. General Motors Truck Co. v. Philadelphia Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Goss Printing Press Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County Construction Co. v. Livengood Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Jones v. JacobsonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Fenton v. BalickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Koehring Company v. VentrescaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API