Legal Opinion
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Lexington Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 16, 2005No. CIV.A.04-1457(ESH)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge. '
This is the second case in which National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) seeks excess insurance • coverage from several of its “excess liability” insurers. See National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Lexington Ins., 365 F.3d 1104 (D.C.Cir.2004). Defendants claim that plaintiffs suit is barred by statute of limitations or by laches and. have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that defendants’ motion must be denied.
BACKGROUND
In September…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ronald T. Phillips v. Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Robinson v. Ergo Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Jovanovic v. US-Algeria Business CouncilDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Associated Producers, Ltd. v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.