Legal Opinion

Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 10, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0943PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Marnie Hammel filed suit against Marsh USA Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (“MMC”), alleging violations of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C. Code Ann. § 2-1401.01 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act 1 , arising out of Plaintiffs employment as a FINPRO Claims Advocate in Washington, D.C. Plaintiff alleges that her former employer, Defendant Marsh USA Inc., discriminated against her on the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Bean v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Gross v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. Haynes v. Dc Water is LifeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API