Legal Opinion
Wickwire v. City & Borough of Juneau
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1976No. 2760 and 2772PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ERWIN, Justice.
In November, 1974, appellant Thomas R. Wickwire filed a complaint alleging that in July, 1973, the City and Borough of Juneau (hereinafter the City) had trespassed on his property while constructing a sewer. On July 16, 1975, the City filed a motion for summary judgment. The City argued that Wickwire’s execution of a sewer easement in exchange for $100 made the case moot.
The sewer line was designed to run in the Dredge Lake Road and River Place rights-of-way. The line was staked in the designed location in 1972 by City survey *784crews. In early 1973, the project engineer in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Anchorage v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Klosterman v. Hickel Investment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Zok v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ehrlander v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.