Legal Opinion
Ehrlander v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1990No. S-3129, S-3361 and S-3383PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
INTRODUCTION
This case arises out of the denial of a request to subdivide real property located in Fairbanks. The owner of the property, appellant Lars Ehrlander, seeks inverse *631condemnation against the State of Alaska Department of Transportation (DOT). The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of DOT.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Ehrlander, a real estate developer, purchased unimproved property zoned by the Fairbanks North Star Borough for high-density housing. When he purchased it, he knew that part of the property lay within a corridor in which DOT was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Thomas E. Foster and Georgia Lee Foster, and Cross-Appellants v. City of Detroit, Michigan, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Conroy-Prugh Glass Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Plumber v. University of Alaska AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- R & Y, INC. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Vanek v. STATE, BOARD OF FISHERIESAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.