Legal Opinion

Zok v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1995No. S-5728PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Hassan Zok filed suit against three Anchorage International Airport Safety Officers and their employer, the State of Alaska, claiming the officers had assaulted and illegally arrested him. 1 In the liability phase of Zok’s bifurcated trial, the jury found the officers guilty of illegally arresting Zok. The same jury awarded Zok zero dollars at the completion of the damages phase of the trial. Zok moved for a new trial three days later. The motion was denied and this appeal followed.

II. DISCUSSION

Zok alleges that the court erred in failing to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. DeNardo v. Calista Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kinegak v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Nelson v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API