Legal Opinion

Bresnik v. Beulah Park Ltd. Partnership, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1993No. 92-1130PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

Beulah Park has a common-law right to exclude persons from its business premises absent specific legislative language to the contrary. The Revised Code contains no such language.

Appellee contends that R.C. Chapter 3769, which empowers the Ohio State Racing Commission with the right to exclude jockey agents from racetracks, abrogates any common-law rights of racetrack owners to exclude jockey agents from their premises. Appellee also argues that Ohio Adm. Code 3769-2-05 and 3769-4-22(B) authorize racing stewards to exclude jockey agents from a racetrack, and, thus, abolish Beulah Park’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Blackwell v. Bachrach, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1956

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. S.O.C., Inc. v. Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ohioans for Concealed Carry, Inc. v. City of ClydeOhio Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API