Legal Opinion

Mills v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 10, 2009No. 08-7127PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.

SENTELLE, Chief Judge.

Four District of Columbia citizens (appellants) filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin further implementation of a police checkpoint program in the District of Columbia. The district court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellants failed to show either irreparable harm or a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Because we hold that the appellants’ showing of irreparable harm is sufficient, and conclude that appellants have shown a substantial likelihood of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  2. Pursuing America's Greatness v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. Larry Klayman v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API