Mills v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Chief Judge.
Four District of Columbia citizens (appellants) filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin further implementation of a police checkpoint program in the District of Columbia. The district court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction, holding that the appellants failed to show either irreparable harm or a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Because we hold that the appellants’ showing of irreparable harm is sufficient, and conclude that appellants have shown a substantial likelihood of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Thomas VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Pursuing America's Greatness v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Leaders of Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Larry Klayman v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.