Legal Opinion

Pursuing America's Greatness v. Federal Election Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 2, 2016No. 15-5264PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Election Commission prohibits unauthorized political committees, like Pursuing America’s Greatness, from using candidates’ names in the titles of their websites and social media pages. Pursuing America’s Greatness sought a preliminary injunction against this rule, which the district court denied. We reverse the district court because the restriction, as applied to Pursuing America’s Greatness, is a content-based ban on speech that likely violates the First Amendment.

I

Pursuing America’s Greatness (PAG) is a political committee that works for the election of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters v. Brian NewbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Damus v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API