Legal Opinion
Archdiocese of Wash. v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 31, 2018No. 17-7171PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Wilkins.
Rogers, Circuit Judge:
*318 The Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority ("WMATA") was established by compact between the State of Maryland, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the District of Columbia to provide safe and reliable transportation services. See Pub. L. No. 89-774, 80 Stat. 1324 (1966). Like other transit authorities, it sells commercial advertising space to defray the costs of its services, and for years it had accepted ads on all types of subjects. In 2015 WMATA closed its advertising space to issue-oriented ads, including political,…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Fulton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- The Koala v. Pradeep KhoslaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Changji Esquel Textile Co. Ltd. v. Gina RaimondoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Anatol Zukerman v. USPSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Am. Freedom Defense Initiative v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.