Legal Opinion
United States v. $39,480.00 in United States Currency
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided March 6, 2002No. 7:01-cv-00157PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE
FURGESON, District Judge.
Claimant Leticia Bullock timely filed a claim for $39,480.00 that federal agents seized from her boyfriend, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881. Despite its good faith attempt to comply with the ninety-day deadline set out in 18 U.S.C. § 983, the Government filed its Verified Complaint for Forfeiture one day late. Bullock seeks dismissal of the Government’s Complaint and release of the Respondent Property.
Before the Court is Bullock’s Motion to Dismiss and Answer to Complaint for Forfeiture,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BorromeoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. One 1977 Cadillac Coupe Deville Vin: 6d47s7q234771Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- First American Bank & Trust of Louisiana v. Texas Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. One White 1987 Tempest Sport BoatDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- United States v. One 1991 Ford Mustang LX, Vin 1FACP44E6MF151861District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- United States v. $229,850.00 in U.S. CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- United States v. One 2007 Harley Davidson Street Glide Motorcycle Vin 1hd1kb4197y722798District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- United States v. 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL350BLTDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.