Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1991 Ford Mustang LX, Vin 1FACP44E6MF151861
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 2, 1996No. Civil A. No. 95-K-2302PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
On September 7, 1995, the United States filed a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881, seeking forfeiture of the Defendant vehicle involved in the civil narcotics provision of 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. Dennis and Monica Armijo *832claim an ownership interest in the vehicle and move to dismiss the complaint. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 (over a suit commenced by the United States) and 1355 (over a forfeiture action).
I. Background.
The complaint alleges in the course of an investigation into the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. ONE 1976 BUICK SKYLARK, ETC.District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- Dwyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1989
- United States v. One White 1987 Tempest Sport BoatDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- United States v. 1986 Ford BroncoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. $39,480.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2002
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- United States v. 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL350BLTDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015