Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RENDELL, Circuit Judge:
Congress passed the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”), Pub.L. No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202, as a “reaction] to public outcry over the government’s too-zealous pursuit of civil and criminal forfeiture” and as an “effort to deter government overreaching.” United States v. Khan, 497 F.3d 204, 208 (2d Cir.2007).1 To that end, Congress crafted a statutory scheme that requires the Government, if it has seized property that someone else purports to own, to file a complaint for judicial forfeiture within 90 days of receipt of a claim (known as a “seized…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Donald WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- United States v. AliDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
- Chikerema v. LoweDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Larson v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.