Legal Opinion

Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 17, 2015No. 12-4574PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RENDELL, Circuit Judge:

Congress passed the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (“CAFRA”), Pub.L. No. 106-185, 114 Stat. 202, as a “reaction] to public outcry over the government’s too-zealous pursuit of civil and criminal forfeiture” and as an “effort to deter government overreaching.” United States v. Khan, 497 F.3d 204, 208 (2d Cir.2007).1 To that end, Congress crafted a statutory scheme that requires the Government, if it has seized property that someone else purports to own, to file a complaint for judicial forfeiture within 90 days of receipt of a claim (known as a “seized…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. Donald WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. AliDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  3. Chikerema v. LoweDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Larson v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API