Legal Opinion
Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 20, 2014No. Slip Op. 14-96; Court Nos. 05-00269, 05-00582, 06-00054, 06-00348, 07-00110, 07-00294, 10-00230, 10-00245, 11-00018, 11-00250, 12-00001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge:
In the 11 above-captioned actions, Plaintiff Rockwell Automation, Inc. contests the classification of “certain short-body timing relays (SBTRs) used in manufacturing applications” that Rockwell imported into the United States. Plaintiffs Consent Motion for Leave to File Out of Time and for Extension of Time to Remain on Reserve Calendar (“Pl.’s Out-of-Time Motion”) at 1; see also Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Amended Consent Motion for Leave to File Out of Time, and to Extend Time to Remain on Reserve Calendar (“Pl.’s Supp. Brief’) at 2. According to Rockwell, the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re ThorpeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Aspects Furniture Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Rienzi and Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014