Legal Opinion
United States v. $229,850.00 in U.S. Currency
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 25, 2014No. CV 13-1316-TUC-CRPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHARLES R. PYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Government filed this forfeiture action pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). *1173(Complaint (Doc. 1)). The Claimants in this case, Dr. Robert Osborne and his wife Debra Osborne seek dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, arguing that the Complaint is untimely. (Doc. 9). The Magistrate Judge has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the parties’ consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The Osbornes’ Motion to Dismiss came on for oral argument on July 29, 2014. (See Transcript (Doc. 26)). For the following…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. 2014 Mercedes-Benz GL350BLTDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
- United States v. $40,000.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- United States v. Six Hundred Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars & No Cents ($614,338.00) in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017