Legal Opinion

Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1932No. 582PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Caedozo

Petitioner and Piedmont Savings Company are separate corporations organized in Georgia. They became affiliated in 1927 when the petitioner became the owner of 96% of the Piedmont stock. In March, 1928, the two corporations filed a consolidated income tax return for 1927 under § 240 of the Revenue Act of 1926. Revenue Act of 1926, c. 27, 44 Stat. 9, 46. During 1927, the petitioner had a net taxable income of $36,587.62, and Piedmont had suffered during the same year a net loss of $453.80. Before its affiliation with the petitioner, it had suffered other and greater losses. Its net loss in 1925…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Maillard v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Security Flour Mills Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Helvering v. Morgan's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API