Legal Opinion
Larchfield Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 20, 1966No. 18, Docket 30068PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff, Larchfield Corporation, is the successor in interest to two corporations both known as The Aspinook Corporation. The older of these (“Old Aspinook”) was organized in 1938; the younger (“New Aspinook”) was a consolidation, effectuated December 18, 1948, of Old Aspinook and two 50% owned subsidiaries, The Lawrence Print Works, Inc. and Arnold Print Works, Inc., pursuant to the settlement of a stockholders’ derivative action in the Supreme Court of New York.
In this suit, begun in the District Court for Connecticut in 1961, Larch-field sought to recover from…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Trust Under the Will of Bingham v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Audrey L. Zeeman, Individually and as of the Estate of Leon S. Lees, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Berry Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- Kurio v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- Orlo G. Burch and Marjorie C. Burch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.