Legal Opinion

Randall v. City of Hoquiam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1902No. 4380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Ohehalis County. — Hon. Mason Irwin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Action for personal injuries. The material allegations of the complaint are:

“That at all the times herein mentioned 8th street has been, and still is, one of the public streets and thoroughfares situate within the said city of Hoquiam, and generally used by the public as such street, and at all said times it was and is the duty of the said defendant to keep said 8th street in good repair and in a reasonably safe condition for travel.
“That on or about November 5, 1901, that part of 8th street commencing at the railroad track near the public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beall v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Saylor v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Laurie v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Noll v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Colquhon v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Benson v. English Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API