Colquhon v. City of Hoquiam
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
— A discussion of the various assignments of error will introduce sufficient of the facts of this case to render unnecessary a detailed statement thereof. The respondent wife was injured upon a sidewalk in the city of Hoquiam, and brought this action for the damages she sustained. The jury awarded her a verdict, upon which judgment was entered and from which the city has appealed.(1) The claim filed by the respondent with the city, in describing the condition of the sidewalk which is alleged to have caused the injury, used this language:
‘ ‘ that said boards were loose and there were no sills…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Beall v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Ellis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Lorence v. City of EllensburghWashington Supreme Court · 1895
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russell v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Amann v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Kelley v. CurtissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Hayden v. Colville Valley National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Kirack v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.