Legal Opinion

Laurie v. City of Ballard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1901No. 3393PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.- — Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Per curiam

Respondents are husband and wife, and as sncb they jointly instituted tbis suit to recover on account of injuries alleged to bave been received by tbe *128wife, Laura 3VI. Laurie. On the 10th day of November, 1898, respondents resided in the city of Ballard, and about half past eight o’clock in the evening" of said day Mrs. Laurie, while walking over the sidewalk along Tail-man avenue, a public street in said city, stepped through a hole in the sidewalk and fell in such a manner that it is claimed she received therefrom serious and probably permanent injuries. The hole had been made by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carrington v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Fuller v. Mayor of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Shaw v. President of the Sun PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hunger v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Gude v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Yakima Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Shearer v. Town of BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bullock v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gallagher v. Town of BuckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Draper v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API