Legal Opinion

Noll v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1902No. 4104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Arthur E. Griffin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. It appears that defendant bad given permission to a property owner who was operating a laundry to uncover or malee an excavation in Main street. Such excavation was made, and, while without barriers or cover around it, the plaintiff fell into' it, and sustained the injuries complained of. When the plaintiff’s testimony was concluded, a motion for non-suit was made by defendant. Two- grounds for non-suit, were urged: (-1) That the city bad no> notice of the unguarded condition of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beall v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amann v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Colquhon v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. McClammy v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Randall v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API