Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Roberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 3460PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The plaintiff sued to have certain conveyances set aside as fraudulent and appeals from the judgment against it. The real basis of the attack is that the evidence does not support the findings of fact. Interwoven with the argument upon this question the appellant makes certain contentions regarding the law. It will tend to clarity to dispose of these contentions in the first instance. Three deeds through which Roberts’ title to the land in controversy became vested in his wife, the respondent, Mida Roberts, are attacked, and a sheriff’s deed under execution against Roberts is relied upon by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Finnie v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. First National Bank v. ShipleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Livingston v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Fares v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API