First National Bank v. Shipley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. LUTTRELL Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Plaintiff and respondent, as the name implies, is a national banking corporation engaged in the banking business in the state of Illinois. Defendants and appellants Clement W. Shipley and Evelyn Shipley are husband and wife. Plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of defendant Clement W. Shipley, instituted the present action against defendants to have a certain assignment which said Clement W. Shipley had made to his wife of his interest in the estate of Faithful W. Ebey, deceased, annulled upon the ground that same was made without…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- First National Bank of Los Angeles v. MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Caldwell v. WeinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Tompkins v. TompkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Wynne v. Boone Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Ashbaugh v. SauerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Knapp v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.