Legal Opinion
Livingston v. Rice
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1955No. Civ. 4916PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUSSELL,
J.-—This is an action to foreclose a second deed of trust on residential property in the city of Bakersfield. There is no dispute as to the material facts.
On February 14,1947, defendant Rice and his wife executed a promissory note payable to plaintiff in the sum of $4,000 for money loaned to Rice. The note was secured by a deed of trust of the same date and both instruments were then delivered to the plaintiff. The note was not paid when due and plaintiff took it with the deed of trust to an attorney to commence foreclosure proceedings. The deed had not been recorded or acknowledged…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bank of Ukiah v. Petaluma Sav. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Withington v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bernstein v. Pavich (In Re Pavich)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1996
- 20th Century Plumbing Co. v. SfregolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Wells Fargo Bank v. PAL Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Del Carlo v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.