Legal Opinion
Fly v. Cline
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1920No. Civ. No. 3214PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
Several actions in the superior court were consolidated and tried as one. The trial resulted in a judgment adverse to Milton A. Fly, the appellant. The controversy presents the question as to whether appellant had the right to redeem the property, a lot in the city of Los Angeles, from a redemption previously made by the Hammond Lumber Company.
The facts necessary to an understanding of the questions presented by the appeal are these:
On February 26, 1913, Della Ingerson, the then owner of the premises, mortgaged the property to the Security Trust & Savings Bank to secure her promissory note…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Carpenter v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Morrow v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Williams v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Denike v. Santa Clara Valley Agricultural SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Schwartz v. ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Thompson v. SchurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Smissaert v. ChiodoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.