Legal Opinion

Merrick v. Thomas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1994No. S-92-1002PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Dina Merrick appeals from the judgment of the district court sustaining the defendants’ demurrer and dismissing Merrick’s action for negligence and promissory estoppel. Merrick appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, and we removed the case to this court under the authority of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) (Cum. Supp. 1992) in order to regulate the caseloads of the appellate courts.

In reviewing a ruling on a general demurrer, an appellate court accepts as true all well-pled facts and the proper and reasonable inferences of law and fact, but not the conclusions of the pleader. Durand v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Anderson v. Nashua Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. DeVaux v. DeVauxNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Parrish v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hamilton v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stinson v. Physicians Immediate Care, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API