Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988No. 86-526PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

UNION PACIFIC-KAISER AGREEMENT

From 1976 and pursuant to its agreement with Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Company, the Union Pacific Railroad Company supplied tracks and service to Kaiser’s chemical facility. The trackage agreement, drafted by Union Pacific, included the following provision:

Section 9. LIABILITY.

The Industry [Kaiser] agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Railroad Company for loss, damage or injury from any act or omission of the Industry, its employes or agents, to the person or property of the parties hereto and their employes and agents, and to the person or property of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jensen v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API