Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1993No. S-90-679PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Plaintiff, Saundra Hamilton, appeals the judgment of the district court, which dismissed her cause of action after having sustained the demurrer of the defendants, City of Omaha and police officer R. Green. The plaintiff elected not to plead further. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s action was brought pursuant to the provisions of the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-901 et seq. (Reissue 1991). In her petition, the plaintiff alleged that on the evening of January 14, 1988, she was physically assaulted by her former husband, Jeffrey Hamilton. She then left the scene of that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Morgan v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. South v. Maryland Ex Rel. PottleSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. FeldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Merrick v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Touche Ross & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API