Legal Opinion
Davis & Tatera, Inc. v. Gray-Syracuse, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 27, 1992No. C-2-90-295PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court to consider the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. This action, brought by a “manufacturers’, representative” against one of the manufacturers it represented for a period of approximately 8 years, includes claims for breach of contract, wrongful termination of an agency agreement, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit.
FACTS
The Plaintiff, Davis <& Tatera, Inc. (“D <fe T”), is an Ohio manufacturers’ representa tive firm that entered into an agency relationship with the Defendant, Gray-Syracuse,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kiser v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Michael Alan Gadsby v. Norwalk Furniture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Aerotronics, Inc. v. Pneumo Abex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Borden v. Antonelli Coll.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Klusty v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.