Legal Opinion
Klusty v. Taco Bell Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 20, 1995No. C-3-95-258PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court upon Motion of Defendant James Santos to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) (Doe. # 11), Motion of Defendant Taco Bell to Dismiss Counts Four through Eight of the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and Motion of Plaintiffs to Amend the Complaint (Doc. # 23). Plaintiff has opposed the Taco Bell Motion (Memorandum in Opposition, Doc. # 21), but not the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- McGrath v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- W.D.I.A. Corp. v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Adkins v. Unum Provident Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Allen-Amos v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.