Legal Opinion

Egbert v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. 7692PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNINGS, Justice.

Petitioner, Eliza Ridd Egbert, seeks by writ of certiorari to set aside an award' of the Industrial Commission (hereinafter called Commission) on the ground that the findings and award of the Commission are not supported by the evidence.

Petitioner was employed as a bookkeeper by Monarch Swimming Pool Equipment Company, Inc. On November 18, 1960 she sustained an injury to her hip. The injury occurred as petitioner turned in her office chair and bumped her toe on the leg of the desk thereby causing her to twist her hip. The injury aggravated a preexisting condition of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tashner v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ujevich v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Korff v. Charles Luke Const. CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Shaw v. SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'NArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hemphill v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rahar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Moore v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Gomez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API