Hemphill v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ANTHONY T. DEDDENS, Judge of the -Superior Court. .
Petitioner seeks to set aside the Industrial Commission’s award of March 4, 1960, that his condition had become stationary and that he was entitled to no further compensation, which was affirmed on a rehearing on November 7, 1960. The question involved is, “Does reasonable evidence support the Commission’s findings?”
On or about December 2, 1954, petitioner was working approximately 300 to 400 feet away from a location at which a chemical was being sprayed on adjoining property and petitioner inhaled fumes from the spray. Following the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tashner v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Harmon v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- McAllister v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Capitol Foundry v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Egbert v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.