Legal Opinion

Moore v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 11, 1970No. 1 CA-IC 305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The petitioner requests that this Court review the award of The Industrial Commission which denied his petition to reopen. This matter is decided under the law as it existed prior to 1 January 1969.

We are called upon to determine whether pain following a recovery with no physical impairment and with no residual objective signs of injury is compensable where the pain does not interfere with the earning capacity of the injured workman.

The petitioner is a tall man of slight build. Following his graduation from high school, he engaged in several areas of employment requiring some…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shaw v. SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'NArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Egbert v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patches v. Industrial Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Raban v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Greer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API