Legal Opinion

Carasso v. Carasso

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 25, 2003No. AC 22965PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHABLER, J.

The defendant, Stephen S. Carasso, appeals and the plaintiff, Jill M. Carasso, cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs motion for contempt, and granting in part the defendant’s motion to modify alimony and certain orders concerning health and life insurance. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) determined his earning capacity and (2) adjudged him in contempt. On cross appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that (1) her earning capacity had changed and (2) a change in circumstances…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Collette v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sabrowski v. SabrowskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Edmond v. FoiseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Maltas v. MaltasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Robichaud v. Hewlett Packard Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Sagalyn v. PedersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API