Legal Opinion
Sabrowski v. Sabrowski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 18, 2007No. AC 26021PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
This appeal returns to this court upon remand from our Supreme Court; Sabrowski v. Sabrowski, 282 Conn. 556, 923 A.2d 686 (2007); for resolution of the claims of the defendant, Beverly R. Sabrowski, that the trial court improperly (1) assessed the circumstances of both parties pursuant to General Statutes §§ 46b-82 and 46b-86, (2) found that the plaintiff, George Sabrowski, met his burden of establishing a substantial change in circumstances, (3) modified the award of alimony and (4) modified the plaintiffs obligation to pay the defendant’s unreimbursed medical bills and to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Sabrowski v. SabrowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Fantasia v. Milford Fastening SystemsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. OsuchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- DePietro v. Department of Public SafetyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Loring v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Baldwin v. CurtisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.